Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Abstract
In recent years, the most daring player in the social media arena proved to be the
microblogging technology, the most energetic in this field being Twitter, raising the interest
of the educational actors. A number of microblogging platforms dedicated to education
were implemented, such as Edmodo, Plurk, Cirip.eu or Twiducate. In this context, the
paper aims to provide an overall analysis of the microblogging platform Cirip.eu for
educational directions such as: information and knowledge management, courses
enhancement, delivering online courses, collaborative projects, communities of practice,
hosting different workshops, conferences or scientific events, building e-portfolios etc.
Thus, the main aspects of the paper will regard the following:
- the facilities offered by Cirip.eu recommend it as a modern and flexible mobile
Social Learning Management System (mSLMS), integrating users' Personal
Learning Environments;
- how microblogging can be integrated with other Web2.0 technologies, and into the
Open Educational Resources movement;
- how the experience and the new pedagogical approach in using microblogging can
be captured and formally represented as learning design objects;
- how learning design objects can be shared, discussed, improved, reused on the
microblogging platform.
Note to the reader: This paper is part of a broader approach of the authors regarding the
use of microblogging in education in order to investigate the degree of integration of this
technology in didactic activities, to identify models and examples of good practices in
teaching, to identify both opportunities and disadvantages, limits and barriers for learning,
to define indicators of social interactions in the microsphere useful for a quality
management of educational activities, to identify success factors, directions and future
trends etc. (see previous papers published by the authors).
Cirip.eu integrates a wide range of Web2.0 applications and social networks organized
around educational resources, many of them included in Tops 100 Tools for Learning (Hart, 2009,
2010). This integration is realized in order to encourage teachers and students to discover those
Web2.0 applications and social networks and integrate them in their teaching/learning activities.
The platform allows the creation of a personal profile / portfolio including ideas, projects,
research and information resources, multimedia objects created individually or collaboratively. All
users’ activities are developed in a dynamic manner and follow a continuous evaluation process by
communicating with members of groups or of the platform. Thus on Cirip each member can build
not only a Personal Learning Environment but also a Personal Learning Network (see Figure 2).
From this perspective and according to classification of (Stutzman, 2009) and analysis of
(Conole and Culver, 2009), Cirip is a profile-centric network and a social network around PLE
objects.
Furthermore, Cirip is a social network around multimedia objects, thus an object-centric
network:
• the objects are part of the communication-conversation flow of the platform;
• the objects connect Cirip with other social networking / Web2.0 applications organized
around educational objects;
• objects can be shared, reused, validated, created or recreated individually or collaboratively
- we can say Cirip offers an opening to Open Educational Resources (OERs);
• meta-objects meaning objects of learning design can be created, specifying learning
scenarios, best practices for integrating new technologies in education etc.
By extension, public or private groups can be considered as social objects transforming
Cirip in a social learning management system (SLMS), or a social network around SLMS objects.
In the last two years, on the microblogging platform Cirip.eu, formal and informal courses
and trainings (hosted in private or public groups) for pupils, students, teachers, trainers, employees
in schools, universities, companies have been organized by different institutions or during European
educational projects. The statistics, timelines, network sections and different visualizations of these
groups proved a high interest and involvement of participants.
Usually the interaction in this groups and on the platform continues after the
courses/trainings ended. The members continue to learn and to practise the knowledge gained
during the courses (the continuous activity being illustrated by the timelines of the participants'
microblogs). The learning community built in each group is enlarged with Cirip members such as
students, trainers, teachers, and specialists, becoming a real community of practice.
Many of those who participate in formal activities build their own Personal Learning
Environment / Network (PLE/PLN) on Cirip to connect, communicate, collaborate and/or share
ideas and resources with the users they follow. PLEs/PLNs (can) contain also (see Figure 2):
• groups for national and international conferences, workshops, events, project management;
• sites / blogs / networks feeds and search feeds;
• social networks providing educational objects / OERs (Open Educational Resources), which
can be included in messages etc.
A special attention is directed to the meta-learning contexts as spaces through which
Cirip users become aware of their learning and knowledge growth. Thus, in the special group on the
platform dedicated to learning designs (The Learning Scenarios group - lds), the teachers/trainers
discuss, validate and improve the scenarios of learning activities and courses they develop,
formalizing them as mindmaps embedded in Cirip notes. Another advantage is that they can also
find peers for peer-mentoring their courses.
However, for the large category of learning activities on the platform we tried to readapt the
taxonomy of Bloom (Churches, 2009):
Furthermore, by valorizing the mobility parameters of the Cirip.eu platform we expand the
learning towards ubiquitous spaces – available to anyone, anywhere, at anytime and from any
anything (read device/technology/apps). Thus, through an approach based on mobile technologies,
multimedia (embbedd) objects and microblogging we adopted a m3 learning strategy for the purpose
of increasing knowledge and learning in authentic environments.
The Cirip specific features for mobile learning presented in Table 2 are based on the (Patten,
Arnedillo Sanchez and Tangney, 2006) framework, having particular meaning and implementation
(Holotescu and Grisseck, 2010):
5.Final remarks
Our activities and research in the last two years on the platform allow us to state that
Cirip.eu has facilities for delivering successful and quality online courses, trainings, workshops,
international projects’ meetings etc. The communication, authoring, monitoring, statistical facilities
foster Cirip.eu as a modern, free, mobile social LMS which integrates many Web2.0 technologies,
and also allows users to develop their PLEs/PLNs. Furthermore, if Twitter and other
microblogging platforms offer mainly the practice context, we point out that Cirip could provide
formal training frameworks and meta-learning contexts which can be adapted to any type of
learning activities. These facilities position Cirip.eu within the spectrum of educational services for
an efficient continuous education, training, learning and personal development.
However we do consider that the success key in using microblogging platform Cirip.eu in
education is to be aware of the fact that there is a relationship between the user, the technological
environment and his learning activities and also to avoid the risk of emphasing the technology and
not the pedagogy.
Although we refer explicitly to Cirip.eu, our remarks may also apply to other microblogging
platforms / services like Twitter, Identi.ca, Plurk, Edmodo, Yammer etc. „Think of it this way:
Microblogging is the way in which you choose to speak, while Cirip.eu is the tool you use to talk to
the world.” (apud Livingston, 2010).
References
Borau, K., Ullrich, C., Feng, J. and Shen, R. (2009), Microblogging for Language Learning:
Using Twitter to Train Communicative and Cultural Competence in M. Spaniol et al. (Eds.):
ICWL 2009, LNCS 5686, pp. 78–87, 2009. Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg.
Churches, A. (2009), Bloom's Digital Taxonomy, http://edorigami.wikispaces.com/Bloom
%27s+Digital+Taxonomy
Conole, G. and Culver, J. (2009), Cloudworks: Social networking for learning design, Ascilite
Conference. Retrieved from
http://www.ascilite.org.au/conferences/melbourne08/procs/conole.pdf.
Conole, G. (2010), Learning design making practice explicit. In: ConnectEd Design
Conference, 28 June - 2 July 2010, Sydney, Australia.
Dunlop, J.C. And Lowhenthal, P.R. (2009), Instructional Uses of Twitter. Chapter 8:45-50 in
CU Online HandBook. Teach differently. Create and Collaborate, Edited by Patrick R.
Lowenthal, David Thomas, Anna Thai, Brian Yuhnke, University of Colorado Denver.
Ebner M. et al. (2010), Microblogs in Higher Education – A Chance to facilitate informal and
process-oriented learning? Computers & Education, doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2009.12.006.
Grosseck, G. and Holotescu, C. (2008), Can we use Twitter for educational activities?, in
Proceedings of the 4th International scientific conference, elearning and software for
education, Bucharest, 17-18 April 2008, Retrieved from http://adlunap.ro/else/papers/015.-
697.1.Grosseck%20Gabriela-Can%20we%20use.pdf.
Grosseck, G. and Holotescu, C. (2009), Indicators for the analysis of learning and practice
communities from the perspective of microblogging as a provocative sociolect in virtual
space, in 5th International Scientific Conference eLSE - eLearning and Software for
Education, Bucharest, 9-10 April 2009.
Grosseck, G. and Holotescu, C. (2010), Microblogging Multimedia-Based Teaching Methods.
Best practices with Cirip.eu, paper presented at World Conference on Educational Sciences,
Istanbul, Turkey, 4-8 February 2010 – Innovation and Creativity.
Hart J. (2009, 2010), Tops 100 Tools for Learning, http://c4lpt.co.uk/recommended
Holotescu, C. and Grosseck, G. (2009), Using Microblogging For Collaborative Learning, in
New Technology Platforms for Learning – Revisited. LOGOS Open Conference on
strengthening the integration of ICTresearch effort, 19-20 ian. 2009 Budapesta, Hungary,
EDEN – European Distance and E-learning Network, pp. 71-80.
Holotescu, C. and Grosseck, G. (2010), Mobile learning through microblogging, paper
presented at World Conference on Information Technology, Istanbul, Turkey, 6-10 October
2010.
Livingston, B. (2010), Using Web2.0 Technologies. In INFOLINE, Vol. 27, Issue 1001/January
2010, ASTD Press, Retrieved from http://goo.gl/8oFvs.
Parry, D. (2008), Twitter for Academia, January 23rd 2008,
http://academhack.outsidethetext.com/home/2008/twitter-for-academia
Patten, B., Arnedillo Sanchez, I. and Tangney, B. (2006), Designing collaborative,
constructionist and contextual applications for handheld devices, Computers & Education,
46, 294-308.
Rangaswami, J.P. (2008), Musing about Social Objects: Molluscs that Matter,
http://confusedofcalcutta.com/2008/02/16/musing-about-social-objects-molluscs-that-
matter/
Reinhardt, W., Ebner, M., Beham, G and Costa, C. (2009), How people are using Twitter
during conferences. In V. Hornung-Prähauser, M. Luckmann (eds.), 5th EduMedia
conference (pp.145-156), Salzburg.
Stutzman, F. (2009), Information Seeking During a Life Transition. AOIR 2009 Doctoral
Colloquium, Milwaukee, http://fredstutzman.com/papers/AOIRDC2009_Stutzman.pdf